Which of the following is NOT a step in determining achievable outcomes?

Which of the following is NOT a step in determining achievable outcomes?

• A. Specify evidence procedure
• B. Avoiding negative phrasing
• C. Is it congruently desirable?
• D. Assess ecological factors

Answer: (B)

In the context of determining achievable outcomes, avoiding negative phrasing is indeed an important consideration when setting goals, but it is not explicitly a step in the process of assessing what outcomes are attainable. Focusing on positive and empowering language can enhance motivation and clarity, however, the core steps typically involve defining the specific goals, clarification on what success looks like (evidence procedure), ensuring those goals align with the individual’s values and desires (congruently desirable), and evaluating the broader context or environment in which these goals will be pursued (ecological factors). In this framework, specifying an evidence procedure helps individuals understand how they will know when they have achieved their goals. Being congruently desirable confirms that the goals are aligned with the individual's deeper motivations and values, while assessing ecological factors ensures that the goals are sustainable given the circumstances surrounding the individual. Thus, avoiding negative phrasing, while beneficial, does not fit into the structured steps necessary to determine achievable outcomes.

In the context of determining achievable outcomes, avoiding negative phrasing is indeed an important consideration when setting goals, but it is not explicitly a step in the process of assessing what outcomes are attainable. Focusing on positive and empowering language can enhance motivation and clarity, however, the core steps typically involve defining the specific goals, clarification on what success looks like (evidence procedure), ensuring those goals align with the individual’s values and desires (congruently desirable), and evaluating the broader context or environment in which these goals will be pursued (ecological factors).

In this framework, specifying an evidence procedure helps individuals understand how they will know when they have achieved their goals. Being congruently desirable confirms that the goals are aligned with the individual's deeper motivations and values, while assessing ecological factors ensures that the goals are sustainable given the circumstances surrounding the individual. Thus, avoiding negative phrasing, while beneficial, does not fit into the structured steps necessary to determine achievable outcomes.